Monday, November 5, 2007

Summary and refrection on week 11

Reminder :Due date of our draft
Dr. Ortega extended the due date of our draft from Tuesday, November 6 to Tuesday, November 11.

Summary:
This week, we read chapter 8 on Affect on Tuesday (Hatsumi, Megumi, and Miyung, thank you for great facilitation!). On Thursday, we discuss myths about affect and L2 learning.

Tuesday

As we did last week, the facilitators give us chance to brainstorm in pairs to think about own definition on affect, one aspect of affect, and how affect relate to our second language learning. The groups mentioned about anxiety, correlation of WTC and communicative competence, personality (introvert vs. extravert), affect on self language learning (pleasure of challenging knowledge can be affect) and so on.

According to Arnold & Brown (1999), affect is “The aspects of emotion, feeling, mood, or attitude, which condition behavior.” Three dimensions of affect are personality (e.g. shyness), changeable factors (e.g. positive/negative language attitude), and constantly fluctuating states (e.g. enthusiasm, anxiety, boredom, apathy, elation.) Although we covered personality, anxiety, WTC, and strategies, the facilitator emphasized affect cover more than them.

We were divided into 4 groups in order to summarize and report influence of each affect. Scenario was given to each group.

1. Personality in L2 Learning
Scenario: In your class, you identify some talkative students dominating and some students who avoid participating in class activities. (Do you see it as problematic? If so, how do you deal with it? If not, why not?)

According to Group 1:
It ranges from slightly problematic to problematic depending on the context and expectation of the class. Solutions are preparing a variety of exercises with various topic and assign roles and so on.

2. Foreign Language anxiety
Scenario: You are in Japan studying abroad. All of your classmates are Japanese who don’t speak English well. Then you are asked to introduce yourself in Japanese. You feel very anxious. (How would you overcome the situation and survive the rest of the semester?)

According to Group 2:
•Comforting myself first and introduce myself.
•Making friends and conduct language exchange.
•Sending email to ask questions.
We argued the last point because it may be difficult for the person to write questions in Japanese.

3. Willingness to communicate
Scenario: You are taking 3 courses this semester.
Class 1. You know a lot about the topic
Class 2. You don’t know a lot but are very interested in the topic.
Class 3. You are neither knowledgeable nor interested in the topic. But the classroom atmosphere is very friendly.
(In which class do you feel most comfortable initiating the conversation? Why?)

According to Group 3:
Each group member seemed to have a different preference. One member said that she preferred the class 1 at first but in the class 3 also she could feel comfortable to initiate the conversation because of her experience. In one class which has a lot of international students, everybody nodded to whatever she said.

4. Learning strategies
Scenario: You are hosting an international student who has a poor memory for vocabulary learning. You try to introduce new words but the student keeps forgetting them. (What kind of effective strategies would you provide the student?)

According to Group 4:
Since the context was home stay, task base would be effective. The international student would not be assessed because we were a host family. (I do not want be assess when I home stayed… )

At last, we worked on WTC battery test and come up with critiques.

Thursday

We were divided into 4 groups in order to discuss myths about affect and L2 learning.
The two myths which Dr. Ortega prepared were:

Myth 1:
Extraversion is something that helps language learning; extraverted people have a good start, an advantage, and are likely to be better language learners.

Myth 2:
Concern for accuracy is a good thing, students who are accuracy-oriented (i.e., they are care about being accurate and pay attention to it) are likely to learn more and better than people who do not worry about accuracy.

Next week will continue to talk about Myths on language learning. I try to collect other myths now.

These are myths I got from each group so far

Masaki's group
Myth 1:
Intrinsic motivation is better than extrinsic motivation.

Myth 2:
Language learners cannot acquire the native-like language fluency and accuracy until they live in the foreign county where people speak the target language.

Myth 3:
Learners can dramatically improve their language skill in the second language context.

Myth 4:
Making a lot of mistakes help you learn the target language.

Myth 5:
Talking with native speakers help you learn the target language rather than talking with non-native speakers.

Myth 6:
Watching TV in the foreign language help you learn the target language.

Myth7:
The more motivation, the more participation in the class.

Ben's group
Myth 1:
The Japanese brain is neutologically wired in a way which makes speaking and understanding Enflish extremely difficult when compared to other ethnic groups.

Myth 2:
People who speak faster are smarter and better at languages.

Myth 3:
People who speak many languaegs are smarter.
People who are smart can learn language fast.

Hatsumi's group
Myth 1:
Musicality is related to languagelearning ability. People who have learned music when they were young have high aptiude in language learning.

6 comments:

Samantha said...

Thank you Emiko for your hard work.

Masaki's group certainly came up with A LOT of myths - what a load of hot air...hahaha! :)

I nearly assumed they were real...they sounded so...well, surreal!!! :)

What I'd like to address, however, is Hatsumi's group's on musicality. I think there is definitely a (direct) correlation between musicality and language aptitude, up to a certain point (as with all myths), esp with tonal languages. I'd like to think I'm pretty musical, and certainly I think the few Chinese languages I speak/understand to one degree or another are very musical and pretty, and that I've an aptitude in language learning, as do most, if not all, of you. In addition, I like to wax lyrical...hahaha! :)

Lourdes said...

Your succinct and good summary is greatly appreciated, Emiko!

The list of myths is very interesting! There is one that I don't think can be considered very extended, though: The one about the Japanese brain. Human brains are all wired in the same neurobiological ways, so imagining that an ethnic, national, or linguistic group has a brain that is different from the rest of humanity would be absurd. Maybe this was intended by that group as a joke, not a myth?

On the other hand, I think there is a related myth that is pretty extended: "For L1 English speakers to learn and master Japanese as an L2 is a huge accomplishment worthy of the utmost admiration; but for L1 Japanese speakers to learn and master English as an L2 is just no big deal, so why do many EFL Japanese students have trouble with English anyway?" Pretty ironic, and pretty biased, if you ask me :-) It also shows very clearly how language learning is never just about language...

Masaki said...

Emiko,

Thank you for your hard work!! It looks great :)
Also, thank you for Nick and you for facilitating the discussion this week and postponing the deadline next week, Dr. Ortega!!

Regarding to the Ben’s group myth about the brain,
I’ve heard about the myth (or joke) before. I remember some scientist was trying to show the mechanism of brain using MRI and how Japanese people have difficulty. But, I think this is coming from the nipponjinron, the strong belief shared among Japanese people that they think the Japanese is different from other nations.

Ben said...

I completely agree with Masaki’s interpretation. Like we said in class on Tuesday, the Japanese brain myth was not intended as a joke. One of our peers who spent a few years in Japan even addressed this in a 660 presentation/paper. It wasn’t just used in advertisements either; it is a myth that is believed by some people in Japan. That does not change the fact that it is ridiculous and not based in any real fact. There are quite a few more along the same lines but most have to do with food.

Samantha said...

Hmmm...I wouldn't be surprised if my Chinese friends were to say the same thing too...that they're just wired differently...I think the same could be said of my own grandparents, who, just bec they didn't go to school, would say rather dismissively that they couldn't pronounce English words like their grandkids can..."you can't teach an old dog new tricks" comes to mind...same logic, different application/result.

Hatsumi said...

Thanks a lot, Emiko, for your hard work!

Regarding Nipponjinron, it came up as one of the topics in SLS380(Bilingual Education) last week.

Well, it's a myth, but some (or many?) Japanese people tend (or want?)to think that they are different from people from other nations, for there was a long isolated period (Edo era, from 1603 to 1867, about 260 years) and many traditional Japanese cultures (e.g. Kabuki)flourished during this period?

As for musicality, it came only from my own interest, just because I like music...